|
Post by strange on Feb 15, 2008 17:08:28 GMT -5
Speaking of Markland, I actually used my praised new theory of "timing" to school that rear-end on the other board when I made a brief comeback. He's the guy that demanded my banishment from there when I was asking some "odd questions about indians" and now he's here asking for people to respect free speech.
For the record, I'm still fascinated by the history of Nude Warfare, recently a murderous soldier from Africa named Joshua Blayhi, aka General ButtNaked, has been infamous for some real slaughtering fights in some recent civil wars. He intimidated a huge fear in all enemies by fighting absolutely nude with nothing to wear but his boots and a gun. Aside from the poor civilians he massacred, the naked effect seemed to have made him and his men very unstoppable against real soldiers, and there's no one more notorious. In addition to "General ButtNaked", there are also the ancient Norse Berserkers and the American Indians who fought with little to no clothing.
So, am I allowed to research nude warfare and be respected? I consider myself a nudist from time to time, and Markland is stepping on beliefs and my free speech! So don't let him whine about that.
Strange
|
|
|
Post by Melani on Feb 15, 2008 17:58:44 GMT -5
Wow, a typical post from Strange! Maybe you should start a thread on Nude Warfare, and those who are interested can post to it.
|
|
|
Post by strange on Feb 15, 2008 18:21:42 GMT -5
Wow, a typical post from Strange! Maybe you should start a thread on Nude Warfare, and those who are interested can post to it. No, I think I'll start my own site to dedicate on that subject. Bringing up the respective subject of nude recreation and warfare usually gets me banned from places. But I love the subject, so i'll see if I can start a cool website on it. Plenty of great information and important lessons in strategy. The fact that the recent man from Africa can pull off such impressive feats of aggression in battle ( note, I don't approve of him because he was a homicidal and satanic maniac), such feats that can be proved useful in recent years are not to be ignored. Strange
|
|
|
Post by benteeneast on Feb 15, 2008 19:11:03 GMT -5
Glad to see Strange and custerwest are good budies.
|
|
andrew1980
Sergeant (Elk Warrior)
Stars & Bars
Posts: 125
|
Post by andrew1980 on Feb 16, 2008 13:11:35 GMT -5
Nude warfare? That seems kinda on the gay side.
|
|
|
Post by custerwest on Feb 16, 2008 17:19:38 GMT -5
nude warfare happened at Little Bighorn too - very frightening to the enemy
|
|
|
Post by strange on Feb 16, 2008 21:05:45 GMT -5
Consequently, some Indians started to lose the grace of their finest strategies when further adapting to the white culture. They fizzled out the more that they adapted, lost alot of valuable and tricky warfare maneuvers until they were finally subdued and lost to their more valuable and effective ways.
The English were certainly very frightened by the Norse Berserkers (or Berserkgangrs). For a short period they were almost unstoppable, until the English figured out to catch them AFTER the frenzied warriors had spent out all of their aggressions. The Berserkers would be so worn and beat, that the English would get them afterward and the Norse were too sore to lift a finger. Indians and Africans are more relaxed in nude warfare, they still stir themselves, but not like the berserkers who would absolutely flip out and kill each other along with the enemy, the berserkers were the maddest.
Strange
|
|
|
Post by treasuredude on Feb 17, 2008 9:18:21 GMT -5
"General ButtNaked"
To anyone who hasn't joined this board, the above would make a great moniker.
|
|
|
Post by bjackson on Feb 17, 2008 16:53:03 GMT -5
"General ButtNaked" To anyone who hasn't joined this board, the above would make a great moniker. lol. I think it would fit even better on the other board!
|
|