|
Post by markland on Feb 3, 2008 8:19:24 GMT -5
Reading the old LBHA board, I am seeing disturbing references to persons who are dues paying members being banned on this "official" LBHA site.
We need clarification, immediately, on who bans, what grounds constitute being banned, the whole nine-yards.
If not agreeing with CSS's and dozens of others depictions of St. George constitute grounds for banning, I suppose I should be banned. Of course, immediately after I will cancel my membership and urge the dozens of others I am in contact with to do the same.
Any LBHA board member is free to contact me directly if they don't have the intestinal fortitude to post a public response.
Billy
You are mistaken Billy. No one has yet been banned at this forum. You must be referring to our old forum, which has banned a good number of people to date. This is one reason why we are no longer associated with it.
The Moderator
|
|
alfuso
Sergeant (Elk Warrior)
Posts: 118
|
Post by alfuso on Feb 3, 2008 9:06:36 GMT -5
Reading the old LBHA board, I am seeing disturbing references to persons who are dues paying members being banned on this "official" LBHA site. We need clarification, immediately, on who bans, what grounds constitute being banned, the whole nine-yards. Billy I can see being banned for disruptive behavior on a board. But this one hasn't been here long enough for anyone to act up that badly long enough. Dues paying members especially should not be denied access to their own forums. It is disturbing to read from one member that they weren't even allowed onto the board to begin with. That smacks of censorship. alfuso This information is false, alfuso. No one has been banned at this board. Billy was mistakenly referring to our old board, where there have been a number of controversial bannings and other forms of censureship.
The Moderator
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 10:32:42 GMT -5
Post by rollingthunder on Feb 3, 2008 10:32:42 GMT -5
Billy,
If that's the case, you can count me in!
RT
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 10:54:58 GMT -5
Post by custerwest on Feb 3, 2008 10:54:58 GMT -5
Tricia is an outright liar. She wrote to me that she had never been banned but pretends to be for fun (schoolgirl behavior). She signed up here under the name of Clara Blinn
Markland serves a a foot soldier for a women who cheated with the LBHA last year and now wants to destroy the entire organization by calling members KKK, nazis etc. and by constantly lying and bashing the Board of Directors and the association. Legal action will probably been taken against these defamatory statements, especially very offensive statements on nazism. Fred is on the top of the list, action is on the way.
These people have no ethics but the LBHA constitution and the civil justice will calm them down.
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 11:16:09 GMT -5
Post by markland on Feb 3, 2008 11:16:09 GMT -5
Tricia is an outright liar. She wrote to me that she had never been banned but pretends to be for fun (schoolgirl behavior). She signed up here under the name of Clara Blinn, it is confirmed by the moderator. Markland serves a a foot soldier for a women who cheat with the LBHA last year and now wants to destroy the entire organization by calling members KKK, nazis etc. and by constantly lying and bashing the Board of Directors and the association. Legal action will probably been taken against these defamatory statements. Fred is on the top of the list, action is on the way. These people have no ethics but the LBHA constitution and the civil justice will calm them down. First, unless someone authorizes it, there is a reasonable degree of privacy expected on these boards. If the moderator is releasing private information to other persons, the moderator (and LBHA) could be in trouble. I am not a lawyer but I am sure a good ambulance chaser can inform whether or not I am correct. Second, David, you seem to be violating the terms of service of this message board by telling untruths and indulging in personal attack. Mr. Moderator, perhaps David needs to spend some time in the corner? Billy
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 11:28:05 GMT -5
Post by custerwest on Feb 3, 2008 11:28:05 GMT -5
;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 11:48:02 GMT -5
Post by moderator on Feb 3, 2008 11:48:02 GMT -5
Tricia is an outright liar. She wrote to me that she had never been banned but pretends to be for fun (schoolgirl behavior). She signed up here under the name of Clara Blinn, it is confirmed by the moderator. Markland serves a a foot soldier for a women who cheat with the LBHA last year and now wants to destroy the entire organization by calling members KKK, nazis etc. and by constantly lying and bashing the Board of Directors and the association. Legal action will probably been taken against these defamatory statements. Fred is on the top of the list, action is on the way. These people have no ethics but the LBHA constitution and the civil justice will calm them down. First, unless someone authorizes it, there is a reasonable degree of privacy expected on these boards. If the moderator is releasing private information to other persons, the moderator (and LBHA) could be in trouble. I am not a lawyer but I am sure a good ambulance chaser can inform whether or not I am correct. Second, David, you seem to be violating the terms of service of this message board by telling untruths and indulging in personal attack. Mr. Moderator, perhaps David needs to spend some time in the corner? Billy I appreciate your concerns and comments on privacy Billy, however, I assure you that no private information is being released to other persons. I will tell David not to attack you personally, but it appears that he is responding to a number of very personal attacks made against him by members of a different Board (of which you are a member.) I do hope you are expressing the same level of concern over these personal and slanderous attacks made against him on that board as you are regarding his comments over here, which seem to be quite tame in contrast. The Moderator
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 11:56:33 GMT -5
Post by markland on Feb 3, 2008 11:56:33 GMT -5
Moderator, in David's case, his deification of GAC causes him to see the world in simple black and white colors.
Regarding private information. Unless a person authorizes or divulges it themselves, a user ID is private information. I spoke to my tame ambulance chaser this morning after the initial post.
So you endorse David's carpet-bombing of anyone belonging to the original LBHA boards? So, since I am a member of that board, David is allowed to deliver personal insults to me? If so, you really need to get a grasp on reality there.
This adventure should be very interesting.
Billy
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 12:00:22 GMT -5
Post by moderator on Feb 3, 2008 12:00:22 GMT -5
Reading the old LBHA board, I am seeing disturbing references to persons who are dues paying members being banned on this "official" LBHA site. We need clarification, immediately, on who bans, what grounds constitute being banned, the whole nine-yards. If not agreeing with CSS's and dozens of others depictions of St. George constitute grounds for banning, I suppose I should be banned. Of course, immediately after I will cancel my membership and urge the dozens of others I am in contact with to do the same. Any LBHA board member is free to contact me directly if they don't have the intestinal fortitude to post a public response. Billy There is no need to jump to false conclusions here Billy. I am very happy to inform you that no one has been banned from this message board. I am surprised that you would be so gullible as to accept at face value a complete falsehood. The person engaged in making these initial accusations was told right away by both myself and the moderator of the old board that she was not banned at all. She is welcome to join us here whenever she wishes. Yet, for some reason, she still persists in engaging in misinformation by keeping a phrase under her profile there claiming that she was "pre-banned from the LBHA site!" Perhaps you need to take up your complaints against this person continuing to illicite false and slanderous information regarding the LBHA.
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 12:06:06 GMT -5
Post by moderator on Feb 3, 2008 12:06:06 GMT -5
Reading the old LBHA board, I am seeing disturbing references to persons who are dues paying members being banned on this "official" LBHA site. We need clarification, immediately, on who bans, what grounds constitute being banned, the whole nine-yards. Billy I can see being banned for disruptive behavior on a board. But this one hasn't been here long enough for anyone to act up that badly long enough. Dues paying members especially should not be denied access to their own forums. It is disturbing to read from one member that they weren't even allowed onto the board to begin with. That smacks of censorship. alfuso Alfuso, there is no need to be concerned. No one has been banned from this site. It seems that, like many other message boards, we seem to have a number of trolls who enjoy spreading false rumours in an attempt to cause havoc and disruption at the site. Please don't be fooled by the silliness of others.
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 12:07:53 GMT -5
Post by foolkiller on Feb 3, 2008 12:07:53 GMT -5
Well, John McCain seems to have been proud to have been a footsoldier in the Reagan Revolution, whatever that means. As to Custerwest, where the heck does he get off calling anyone a liar, or attacking someone for being loyal to someone else, or for bringing up what happened on another board.
And just who are "these people" that he levels a blanket charge of "lying" and "having no ethics" against. If he has problems with people on another board, let him take his pettiness to that board and confront those people directly and stop cluttering up this board with his drivel and vituperation [is that a word, I must consult my dictionary - does it come after "gullible?"]. So long as he sticks to the facts and his glorification of the Boy General, I have no problem with his posts; but he makes broad statements, gives no time-line when challenged to do so to back up his "dawdling" characterization of Benteen - and can find time to charge who knows what to who knows who, instead of answering perfectly civil questions.
And wonders why people get upset with him. Go figure.
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 12:14:09 GMT -5
Post by markland on Feb 3, 2008 12:14:09 GMT -5
Reading the old LBHA board, I am seeing disturbing references to persons who are dues paying members being banned on this "official" LBHA site. We need clarification, immediately, on who bans, what grounds constitute being banned, the whole nine-yards. If not agreeing with CSS's and dozens of others depictions of St. George constitute grounds for banning, I suppose I should be banned. Of course, immediately after I will cancel my membership and urge the dozens of others I am in contact with to do the same. Any LBHA board member is free to contact me directly if they don't have the intestinal fortitude to post a public response. Billy There is no need to jump to false conclusions here Billy. I am very happy to inform you that no one has been banned from this message board. I am surprised that you would be so gullible as to accept at face value a complete falsehood. The person engaged in making these initial accusations was told right away by both myself and the moderator of the old board that she was not banned at all. She is welcome to join us here whenever she wishes. Yet, for some reason, she still persists in engaging in misinformation by keeping a phrase under her profile there claiming that she was "pre-banned from the LBHA site!" Perhaps you need to take up your complaints against this person continuing to illicite false and slanderous information regarding the LBHA. I do not think it was deliberate falsehood but rather technical incompetence as the person said that her pop-up blocker setting was incorrect. my glassumption is she tried to reach this site from the main web site which is the only pop-up I spotted. My complaint is specifically about being attacked by David. My request for information was based upon the person's original post but is still is a valid request despite the original poster's technical FUBAR. What are the ground-rules? Are statements critical of GAC grounds for immediate dismissal? Billy P.S. You need to tweak the profanity filter as it does not like the word assumption. Very strange...everytime I edit it to the correct spelling in the message body it comes back with the GL in front of it, yet, in the post script it allows it.
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 12:28:20 GMT -5
Post by moderator on Feb 3, 2008 12:28:20 GMT -5
Moderator, in David's case, his deification of GAC causes him to see the world in simple black and white colors. To each his own, Billy. You have already been informed that no private information has been given to anyone. Why do you persist in making false and slanderous insinuations here? t seems to me that David is the one who has been the subject of a massive carpet bombing campaign. There are no grounds to personally insult anyone, either at this site or at the other one. In either case, David has been asked not to engage in personal insults here, although I know it must be difficult for him when he sees those same individuals from a different message board who have, and continue, to engage in a vicious personal campaign against him which is allowed to go on unabated. If you are truly interested in justice and fairness, I would suggest you show the same level of concern regarding the vicious personal attacks made against him and others there, as you do over here. We really do not wish for this message board to devolve into the kind of vitriolic name-calling and continuous slander that goes on at other boards we are familiar with. Indeed. The Moderator I
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 12:38:34 GMT -5
Post by markland on Feb 3, 2008 12:38:34 GMT -5
Tricia is an outright liar. She wrote to me that she had never been banned but pretends to be for fun (schoolgirl behavior). She signed up here under the name of Clara Blinn Markland serves a a foot soldier for a women who cheated with the LBHA last year and now wants to destroy the entire organization by calling members KKK, nazis etc. and by constantly lying and bashing the Board of Directors and the association. Legal action will probably been taken against these defamatory statements, especially very offensive statements on nazism. Fred is on the top of the list, action is on the way. These people have no ethics but the LBHA constitution and the civil justice will calm them down. Moderator, I am not persisting in anything except responding to David's assertion that Trish uses the name Clara Blinn. His previous posting of it asserted that the information came from the Moderator. Since then that portion has now been removed. David is threatening legal action against various members of the original LBHA board. That is a terroristic threat. He attacked me without any provocation. If you are who I think you are, you really need to go back and read Custerstillstands posts on the original LBHA board as they came before you. If you are not, you definitely need to read them to understand whom LBHA is sleeping with. Billy
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 3, 2008 12:41:10 GMT -5
Post by custersfreckles on Feb 3, 2008 12:41:10 GMT -5
This is probably going to be my only post at this board. If no-one is giving out personal information, then why did it CLEARLY state in Custerwest's post that "she signed up here under the name Clara Blinn, it is CONFIRMED BY THE MODERATOR [my emphasis]." Why? If I'm a liar, doesn't that make Custerwest the source of all truth?
Look, you may have problems with my novel. You may not like the fact that I question the current administration of this organisation and its current Saint Autie bent, but I have done nothing that approaches the level that for the safety of this board, my personal information must be released. To anyone. I deserve an apology on behalf of the owners of this forum and the Board of Directors.
If such flagrant disregard towards my--and others'--personal rights continue, I will contact my local authorities.
Tricia Johnson-McDuffie Little Rock, AR
|
|