|
Banned?
Feb 5, 2008 13:12:16 GMT -5
Post by huckleberryjoe on Feb 5, 2008 13:12:16 GMT -5
MR. Tommyk says - I see we have a love-fest between CSS & huckleberryjoe
How dare you say that? YOU are one of the very one’s that have not shown custerwest the full level of respect he deserves. ‘Stomach-churning’? Have you seen his website, Man? I don’t think you bothered to look at it all. Let me explain facts to you Mister tommyk. Something happened to General Custer that none of us understand. WE want to openly explore everything. I hoped custerwest could lead us to the bottom of things. I believe he wants that too. We could all explore together, but someone started lying to him about me. Lying about things I said. Even going so far as to apparently cut down the post I had for him. Don‘t you see what‘s going on man? Just because I was trying to stand behind him here, I get singled out. Custerwest has ideas that no one else has had the nerve to say out loud. NO ONE. That, I’m sure, includes you too MISTER tommyk!!! Man, I’m still mad about this whole missing post thing. It really hurts very much. I hope whoever did it is happy. I’m not.
huckleberryjoe- and that's MISTER huckleberryjoe to you MISTER tommyk
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 5, 2008 14:13:33 GMT -5
Post by tommyk on Feb 5, 2008 14:13:33 GMT -5
Oh, I've seen his site. I almost expect to see Custer walking on water.
And I've had many a discussion with him with his one-sided views of Custer/LBH/Indians
I have no idea who may have sabotaged your posts or whatever. I believe in free speech.
And I, along with many have been insulted with his disgusting photos that have been e-mailed without us asking for them.
As far as his views go, everyone has a right to their position, even if it is dangerously warped.
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 5, 2008 14:44:21 GMT -5
Post by huckleberryjoe on Feb 5, 2008 14:44:21 GMT -5
Tommyk, I’ll try to help you understand better.
"Oh, I've seen his site. I almost expect to see Custer walking on water." Have you seen halos placed on General Custer there? NO? Look closer.
"And I've had many a discussion with him with his one-sided views of Custer/LBH/Indians" The truth has only ONE side. I know that, and I’m sure you do too.
"I believe in free speech." Good. That’s probably the real reason custerwest is here.
"And I, along with many have been insulted with his disgusting photos that have been e-mailed without us asking for them." I haven’t seen them, but I’ll bet they are not his and he just took them from other people.
"As far as his views go, everyone has a right to their position, even if it is dangerously warped." At least you’re right about his views and should have some better understanding of his chosen position with Custer, and why he would chose it.
Sincerely, huckleberryjoe
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 5, 2008 19:56:31 GMT -5
Post by huckleberryjoe on Feb 5, 2008 19:56:31 GMT -5
I didn’t mean to be speaking for custerwest. He can do that. He makes it clearer, to anyone that’s listening than I ever could, what he’s saying and what he‘s all about. I won’t even try to explain him and his ideas. But he’s not here. I understand that he’s in the Swiss army. Switzerland is a beautiful but small country. Like every other country fighting for its freedom in these horrid times, it needs its soldiers to help defend it. Without good soldiers it wouldn’t be a free or beautiful country for long. Custerwest is a soldier there, so he cannot be here to speak for himself, we need to recognize that fact. In short we need to understand that custerwest is a Swiss soldier and Switzerland needs help. Some things are not what they seem. I’ve heard that, ‘Truth can be stranger than fiction,’ I know you’ve heard it said too. Custerwest has shown us just how strange things can be when we are looking for the truth. A few people see it clearly and I hope that one day everyone will see it as well. For me personally, it’s just plain heart breaking to see how the truth has been cluttered up and how custerwest has been treated here. I ask myself, ‘When will the non-sense stop?’ ‘Why won’t it just go away?’ I don’t see it happening. I don’t see sanity on the horizon. The nonsensical has a life of its own. It just keeps going and going and going. The only thing I can do is keep addressing it. To keep fighting, in my humble way against crack pots and fools, and the uneducated or ignorant. Fighting against those who are unfair. Politely so, but taking my stand with custerwest until the end. Until the truth is clearly seen by everyone.
Sincerely, huckleberryjoe
|
|
andrew1980
Sergeant (Elk Warrior)
Stars & Bars
Posts: 125
|
Banned?
Feb 5, 2008 22:40:25 GMT -5
Post by andrew1980 on Feb 5, 2008 22:40:25 GMT -5
Beenteeneast Who is your picture of? Is it a younger Beenteen?
|
|
andrew1980
Sergeant (Elk Warrior)
Stars & Bars
Posts: 125
|
Banned?
Feb 5, 2008 22:43:44 GMT -5
Post by andrew1980 on Feb 5, 2008 22:43:44 GMT -5
What disgusting pictures?What are you guys talking about?
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 5, 2008 23:15:01 GMT -5
Post by benteeneast on Feb 5, 2008 23:15:01 GMT -5
Beenteeneast Who is your picture of? Is it a younger Beenteen? Benteen 1867 circa 1865 amended from rch comment
|
|
|
Post by rch on Feb 6, 2008 1:29:23 GMT -5
Benteeneast,
Benteen is wearing an infantry officer's forage cap and the two rows of buttons of a field officer. That's probably a photo taken while he was Col of the 138th U. S. C. Inf. from 1865 to early 1866.
rch
|
|
|
Post by benteeneast on Feb 6, 2008 5:16:39 GMT -5
Thanks rch If you google it It says circa 1865 so I amended to that date.
|
|
|
Post by custerwest on Feb 8, 2008 9:14:15 GMT -5
huckleberryjoe, I am starting to love you, man ! Sorry if something was misunderstood!
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 8, 2008 10:07:47 GMT -5
Post by huckleberryjoe on Feb 8, 2008 10:07:47 GMT -5
huckleberryjoe, I am starting to love you, man !
Thank you custerwest. I have the same feelings. I knew it would be OK if we gave it a chance.
Joe
|
|
|
Banned?
Feb 8, 2008 11:16:19 GMT -5
Post by tommyk on Feb 8, 2008 11:16:19 GMT -5
I need a hanky!
|
|